Is Evidence-Based Organizational Innovation in the NHS a Chimaera – Or Just Elusive?

Rod Sheaff*, Susan Pickard, Bernard Dowling

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Evidence-based adoption of organizational innovations requires explicit definition of the outcomes the innovations are intended to produce. Implementation theory, however, suggests that organizational innovations are often politicized in the sense that the prospect of implementing them provokes conflicts of interests among the parties affected. Then the intended outcomes of the innovation are liable to be formulated ambiguously, misleadingly or not at all, which makes evidence-based organizational innovation unattainable. Analysis of 61 organizational innovations in nine English NHS primary care trusts suggests that while the majority of innovations were not politicized in this way, a substantial minority were. Innovations whose adoption is motivated by evidence can therefore be differentiated from politicized innovations whose adoption is not so motivated, even when they nevertheless do have evidential support.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)290-310
Number of pages0
JournalSocial Policy and Administration
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2009

Keywords

  • Evidence-based; Implementation; NHS England; Organizational innovation; Primary care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is Evidence-Based Organizational Innovation in the NHS a Chimaera – Or Just Elusive?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this