TY - JOUR
T1 - II: METHODS.
AU - Floccia, Caroline
AU - Sambrook, Thomas D.
AU - Delle, Luche C
AU - Kwok, Rosa
AU - Goslin, Jeremy
AU - White, Laurence
AU - Cattani, Allegra
AU - Sullivan, Emily
AU - Abbot-Smith, Kirsten
AU - Krott, Andrea
AU - Mills, Debbie
AU - Rowland, Caroline
AU - Gervain, Judit
AU - Plunkett, Kim
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - The methods described in this chapter cover the cohort data collection, which
constituted the common data set for all three studies reported in this paper. A sample of 430
bilingual toddlers, learning British English and one of 13 target Additional Languages (N =
372), or any other Additional Language (N = 58), were identified over a 2-year period. To
increase variation in both English/Additional Language pairs and in the situational factors
outlined above (language exposure, mode of exposure and demographic factors), data was
collected through trained research assistants recruited in the six universities involved in this
project (Bangor, Birmingham, Kent, Liverpool, Oxford and Plymouth), as well as in Bristol
and Leicester, each having access to multilingual populations to various degrees. However,
since the testing platform was remotely accessible, the final sample comprised families from
all areas of the UK, apart from Scotland and Northern Ireland. Bangor had the additional
advantage of being located in a region with 75% bilingual Welsh-English children, providing
a unique opportunity to compare language skills in bilinguals growing in a region with
predominant bilingualism, to those whose bilingualism is linked to immigration.
AB - The methods described in this chapter cover the cohort data collection, which
constituted the common data set for all three studies reported in this paper. A sample of 430
bilingual toddlers, learning British English and one of 13 target Additional Languages (N =
372), or any other Additional Language (N = 58), were identified over a 2-year period. To
increase variation in both English/Additional Language pairs and in the situational factors
outlined above (language exposure, mode of exposure and demographic factors), data was
collected through trained research assistants recruited in the six universities involved in this
project (Bangor, Birmingham, Kent, Liverpool, Oxford and Plymouth), as well as in Bristol
and Leicester, each having access to multilingual populations to various degrees. However,
since the testing platform was remotely accessible, the final sample comprised families from
all areas of the UK, apart from Scotland and Northern Ireland. Bangor had the additional
advantage of being located in a region with 75% bilingual Welsh-English children, providing
a unique opportunity to compare language skills in bilinguals growing in a region with
predominant bilingualism, to those whose bilingualism is linked to immigration.
U2 - 10.1111/mono.12349
DO - 10.1111/mono.12349
M3 - Article
SN - 0037-976X
VL - 83
SP - 30
EP - 42
JO - Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development
JF - Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development
IS - 1
ER -