Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

  • Daniel J. Klionsky*
  • , Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz
  • , Sara Abdelfatah
  • , Mahmoud Abdellatif
  • , Asghar Abdoli
  • , Steffen Abel
  • , Hagai Abeliovich
  • , Marie H. Abildgaard
  • , Yakubu Princely Abudu
  • , Abraham Acevedo-Arozena
  • , Iannis E. Adamopoulos
  • , Khosrow Adeli
  • , Timon E. Adolph
  • , Annagrazia Adornetto
  • , Elma Aflaki
  • , Galila Agam
  • , Anupam Agarwal
  • , Bharat B. Aggarwal
  • , Maria Agnello
  • , Patrizia Agostinis
  • Javed N. Agrewala, Alexander Agrotis, Patricia V. Aguilar, S. Tariq Ahmad, Zubair M. Ahmed, Ulises Ahumada-Castro, Sonja Aits, Shu Aizawa, Yunus Akkoc, Tonia Akoumianaki, Hafize Aysin Akpinar, Ahmed M. Al-Abd, Lina Al-Akra, Abeer Al-Gharaibeh, Moulay A. Alaoui-Jamali, Simon Alberti, Elísabet Alcocer-Gómez, Cristiano Alessandri, Muhammad Ali, Al-Bari MA Alim, Saeb Aliwaini, Javad Alizadeh, Eugènia Almacellas, Alexandru Almasan, A Alonso, GD Alonso, Nihal Altan-Bonnet, Dario C. Altieri, Élida M.C. Álvarez, Sara Alves, Sara Alves, Mazen M. Alzaharna, Marialaura Amadio, Consuelo Amantini, Cristina Amaral, Susanna Ambrosio, Amal O. Amer, Veena Ammanathan, Zhenyi An, Stig U. Andersen, Shaida A. Andrabi, Magaiver Andrade-Silva, Allen M. Andres, Sabrina Angelini, David Ann, Uche C. Anozie, Mohammad Y. Ansari, Pedro Antas, Adam Antebi, Zuriñe Antón, Tahira Anwar, Lionel Apetoh, Nadezda Apostolova, T Araki, Y Araki, Kohei Arasaki, Wagner L. Araújo, Jun Araya, Catherine Arden, Maria Angeles Arévalo, Sandro Arguelles, Esperanza Arias, Jyothi Arikkath, Hirokazu Arimoto, Aileen R. Ariosa
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Faculty of Pharmacy - Ain Shams University
  • IRCCS Istituto Europeo di Oncologia - Milano
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
  • Medical University of Graz
  • Pasteur Institute of Iran
  • Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • Danish Cancer Society
  • University of Copenhagen
  • University of Tromsø – The Arctic University of Norway
  • University of La Laguna
  • University of California at Davis
  • University of Toronto
  • Innsbruck Medical University
  • University of Calabria
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Inflammation Research Center
  • University of Palermo
  • KU Leuven
  • Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
  • University of Dundee
  • University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
  • Colby College
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore
  • Universidad Mayor
  • Lund University
  • Nihon University
  • Koc University
  • University of Crete
  • Divisions of Molecular Pathology and Cancer Therapeutics
  • Gulf Medical University
  • University of Sydney
  • Insight Institute of Neurosurgery and Neuroscience
  • McGill University
  • Technische Universität Dresden
  • University of Seville
  • University of Rome La Sapienza
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Islamic University of Gaza
  • University of Manitoba
  • The Francis Crick Institute
  • University of Barcelona
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Wistar Institute
  • Universidad de Buenos Aires
  • University of Porto
  • University of Pavia
  • University of Camerino
  • Fondazione Telethon
  • Ohio State University
  • Save as Ravi Manjithaya
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • Aarhus University
  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Universidade Nove de Julho
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • University of Bologna
  • City of Hope National Med Center
  • University of Tennessee
  • Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology
  • NOVA University Lisbon
  • University of Cologne
  • University of Bristol
  • University of Helsinki
  • Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
  • University of Valencia
  • Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences
  • Universidade Federal de Viçosa
  • The Jikei University School of Medicine
  • Newcastle University
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) and CIBERFES
  • Yeshiva University
  • Howard University
  • Tohoku University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

751 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-382
Number of pages0
JournalAutophagy
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this