Abstract
<jats:p>The military offers a form of welfare-for-work but when personnel leave they lose this safety net, a loss exacerbated by the rollback neoliberalism of the contemporary welfare state. Increasingly the third sector has stepped in to address veterans’ welfare needs through operating within and across military/civilian and state/market/community spaces and cultures. In this paper we use both veterans’ and military charities’ experiences to analyse the complex politics that govern the liminal boundary zone of post-military welfare. Through exploring ‘crossing’ and ‘bridging’ we conceptualise military charities as ‘boundary subjects’, active yet dependent on the continuation of the civilian-military binary, and argue that the latter is better understood as a multidirectional, multiscalar and contextual continuum. Post-military welfare emerges as a competitive, confused and confusing assemblage that needs to be made more navigable in order to better support the ‘heroic poor’.</jats:p>
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2628-2644 |
| Number of pages | 0 |
| Journal | Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 9 Dec 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'From warfare to welfare: veterans, military charities and the blurred spatiality of post-service welfare in the United Kingdom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver