Fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography coronary angiography in the assessment and management of stable chest pain: the FORECAST randomized trial

Nick Curzen*, Zoe Nicholas, Beth Stuart, Sam Wilding, Kayleigh Hill, James Shambrook, Zina Eminton, Darran Ball, Camilla Barrett, Lucy Johnson, Jacqui Nuttall, Kim Fox, Derek Connolly, P O’Kane, Alex Hobson, Anoop Chauhan, Neal Uren, Gerry McCann, Colin Berry, Justin CarterCarl Roobottom, Mamas Mamas, Ronak Rajani, Ian Ford, Pamela Douglas, Mark Hlatky

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Aims </jats:title> <jats:p>Fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) using computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) determines both the presence of coronary artery disease and vessel-specific ischaemia. We tested whether an evaluation strategy based on FFRCT would improve economic and clinical outcomes compared with standard care.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods and results </jats:title> <jats:p>Overall, 1400 patients with stable chest pain in 11 centres were randomized to initial testing with CTCA with selective FFRCT (experimental group) or standard clinical care pathways (standard group). The primary endpoint was total cardiac costs at 9 months. Secondary endpoints were angina status, quality of life, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and use of invasive coronary angiography. Randomized groups were similar at baseline. Most patients had an initial CTCA: 439 (63%) in the standard group vs. 674 (96%) in the experimental group, 254 of whom (38%) underwent FFRCT. Mean total cardiac costs were higher by £114 (+8%) in the experimental group, with a 95% confidence interval from −£112 (−8%) to +£337 (+23%), though the difference was not significant (P = 0.10). Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events did not differ significantly (10.2% in the experimental group vs. 10.6% in the standard group) and angina and quality of life improved to a similar degree over follow-up in both randomized groups. Invasive angiography was reduced significantly in the experimental group (19% vs. 25%, P = 0.01).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion </jats:title> <jats:p>A strategy of CTCA with selective FFRCT in patients with stable angina did not differ significantly from standard clinical care pathways in cost or clinical outcomes, but did reduce the use of invasive coronary angiography.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3844-3852
Number of pages0
JournalEuropean Heart Journal
Volume42
Issue number37
Early online date16 Jul 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography coronary angiography in the assessment and management of stable chest pain: the FORECAST randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this