Fight tactics in wood ants: individuals in smaller groups fight harder but die faster.

Tim P. Batchelor, Mark Briffa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

When social animals engage in inter-group contests, the outcome is determined by group sizes and individual masses, which together determine group resource-holding potential ('group RHP'). Individuals that perceive themselves as being in a group with high RHP may receive a motivational increase and increase their aggression levels. Alternatively, individuals in lower RHP groups may increase their aggression levels in an attempt to overcome the RHP deficit. We investigate how 'group RHP' influences agonistic tactics in red wood ants Formica rufa. Larger groups had higher total agonistic indices, but per capita agonistic indices were highest in the smallest groups, indicating that individuals in smaller groups fought harder. Agonistic indices were influenced by relative mean mass, focal group size, opponent group size and opponent group agonistic index. Focal group attrition rates decreased as focal group relative agonistic indices increased and there was a strong negative influence of relative mean mass. The highest focal attrition rates were received when opponent groups were numerically large and composed of large individuals. Thus, fight tactics in F. rufa seem to vary with both aspects of group RHP, group size and the individual attributes of group members, indicating that information on these are available to fighting ants.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3243-3250
Number of pages0
JournalProc Biol Sci
Volume278
Issue number1722
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Nov 2011

Keywords

  • Agonistic Behavior
  • Animals
  • Ants
  • Behavior
  • Animal
  • Body Size
  • England
  • Female
  • Group Processes
  • Linear Models
  • Mortality
  • Population Density
  • Social Behavior

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fight tactics in wood ants: individuals in smaller groups fight harder but die faster.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this