TY - JOUR
T1 - FEA modelling and environmental assessment of a thin-walled composite drive shaft
AU - Searle, Joseph
AU - Meng, Maozhou
AU - Summerscales, John
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Fibre reinforced plastics (FRP) composites have been widely used in the automotive industry with the primary focus on reduced mass. However, there are relatively few reports on their application on power transmission components, such as drive shafts. This paper explores the feasibility of replacing the traditional structural steel by light weight FRP composites in a drive shaft. Three FRP composites are considered against a steel drive shaft; basalt/epoxy, carbon/epoxy, and CNT (carbon nanotubes) reinforced carbon/epoxy composites. The mechanical performance was analysed by finite element analysis (FEA) tool and classical laminate theory (CLT), while the environmental performance was evaluated by life cycle assessment (LCA) method. The study shows that with careful design a composite drive shaft can outperform the mechanical performance of a steel shaft (up to 90% mass saving, and 50% higher Factor of Safety). The study found steel shafts were preferable to FRP shafts based on embodied energy (steel total embodied energy 150MJ, FRP +325MJ). Reductions in carbon footprint from reduced emissions due to weight savings meant a carbon/epoxy shaft was preferable to a steel shaft. Two new material indices were suggested which can be used to select materials based on minimum embodied energy and global warming potential.
AB - Fibre reinforced plastics (FRP) composites have been widely used in the automotive industry with the primary focus on reduced mass. However, there are relatively few reports on their application on power transmission components, such as drive shafts. This paper explores the feasibility of replacing the traditional structural steel by light weight FRP composites in a drive shaft. Three FRP composites are considered against a steel drive shaft; basalt/epoxy, carbon/epoxy, and CNT (carbon nanotubes) reinforced carbon/epoxy composites. The mechanical performance was analysed by finite element analysis (FEA) tool and classical laminate theory (CLT), while the environmental performance was evaluated by life cycle assessment (LCA) method. The study shows that with careful design a composite drive shaft can outperform the mechanical performance of a steel shaft (up to 90% mass saving, and 50% higher Factor of Safety). The study found steel shafts were preferable to FRP shafts based on embodied energy (steel total embodied energy 150MJ, FRP +325MJ). Reductions in carbon footprint from reduced emissions due to weight savings meant a carbon/epoxy shaft was preferable to a steel shaft. Two new material indices were suggested which can be used to select materials based on minimum embodied energy and global warming potential.
UR - https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/context/secam-research/article/1780/viewcontent/Searle_et_al_composite_driveshaft_deposit.pdf
U2 - 10.1016/j.tws.2022.109799
DO - 10.1016/j.tws.2022.109799
M3 - Article
SN - 0263-8231
VL - 180
JO - Thin-Walled Structures
JF - Thin-Walled Structures
IS - 0
ER -