Evaluating the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for individuals with visible differences: a systematic review of the empirical literature.

Alyson Bessell; Timothy P. Moss

doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.04.005

Evaluating the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for individuals with visible differences: a systematic review of the empirical literature.

Alyson Bessell^*, Timothy P. Moss

^*Corresponding author for this work

University of the West of England

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The objective of this review was to systematically identify and evaluate all known studies testing empirically the efficacy of psychosocial intervention programmes for adults with visible differences. Twelve papers met the inclusion criteria. None of the papers demonstrated adequately the clinical effectiveness of the interventions. The review concluded that further research was needed to demonstrate adequately the effectiveness of existing interventions, and a greater number of Randomised Controlled Trials and experimental studies were required to increase the methodological validity of intervention studies.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	227-238
Number of pages	0
Journal	Body Image
Volume	4
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.04.005
Publication status	Published - Sept 2007
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Adaptation
Psychological
Adolescent
Adult
Body Image
Burns
Cicatrix
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Face
Facial Injuries
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Humans
Phobic Disorders
Prejudice
Psoriasis
Psychotherapy
Group
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Self-Help Groups
Skin
Skin Abnormalities
Skin Diseases
Social Desirability
Treatment Outcome
Vitiligo

Access to Document

10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.04.005

BODYIMAGE-D-07-00009[1]

Cite this

@article{d23b6dedd8054a5fa58ab6525cf13fe2,

title = "Evaluating the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for individuals with visible differences: a systematic review of the empirical literature.",

abstract = "The objective of this review was to systematically identify and evaluate all known studies testing empirically the efficacy of psychosocial intervention programmes for adults with visible differences. Twelve papers met the inclusion criteria. None of the papers demonstrated adequately the clinical effectiveness of the interventions. The review concluded that further research was needed to demonstrate adequately the effectiveness of existing interventions, and a greater number of Randomised Controlled Trials and experimental studies were required to increase the methodological validity of intervention studies.",

keywords = "Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Body Image, Burns, Cicatrix, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Face, Facial Injuries, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Phobic Disorders, Prejudice, Psoriasis, Psychotherapy, Group, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Self-Help Groups, Skin, Skin Abnormalities, Skin Diseases, Social Desirability, Treatment Outcome, Vitiligo",

author = "Alyson Bessell and Moss, {Timothy P.}",

year = "2007",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.04.005",

language = "English",

volume = "4",

pages = "227--238",

journal = "Body Image",

issn = "1740-1445",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for individuals with visible differences: a systematic review of the empirical literature.

AU - Bessell, Alyson

AU - Moss, Timothy P.

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - The objective of this review was to systematically identify and evaluate all known studies testing empirically the efficacy of psychosocial intervention programmes for adults with visible differences. Twelve papers met the inclusion criteria. None of the papers demonstrated adequately the clinical effectiveness of the interventions. The review concluded that further research was needed to demonstrate adequately the effectiveness of existing interventions, and a greater number of Randomised Controlled Trials and experimental studies were required to increase the methodological validity of intervention studies.

AB - The objective of this review was to systematically identify and evaluate all known studies testing empirically the efficacy of psychosocial intervention programmes for adults with visible differences. Twelve papers met the inclusion criteria. None of the papers demonstrated adequately the clinical effectiveness of the interventions. The review concluded that further research was needed to demonstrate adequately the effectiveness of existing interventions, and a greater number of Randomised Controlled Trials and experimental studies were required to increase the methodological validity of intervention studies.

KW - Adaptation

KW - Psychological

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Body Image

KW - Burns

KW - Cicatrix

KW - Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

KW - Face

KW - Facial Injuries

KW - Head and Neck Neoplasms

KW - Humans

KW - Phobic Disorders

KW - Prejudice

KW - Psoriasis

KW - Psychotherapy

KW - Group

KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

KW - Self-Help Groups

KW - Skin

KW - Skin Abnormalities

KW - Skin Diseases

KW - Social Desirability

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Vitiligo

U2 - 10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.04.005

DO - 10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.04.005

M3 - Article

SN - 1740-1445

VL - 4

SP - 227

EP - 238

JO - Body Image

JF - Body Image

IS - 3

ER -

Evaluating the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for individuals with visible differences: a systematic review of the empirical literature.

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this