Abstract
A transparent and evidence-based priority-setting process promotes the optimal use of resources to improve health outcomes. Decision-makers and funders have begun to increasingly engage representatives of patients and healthcare consumers to ensure that research becomes more relevant. However, disadvantaged groups and their needs may not be integrated into the priority-setting process since they do not have a "political voice" or are unable to organise into interest groups. Equitable priority-setting methods need to balance patient needs, values, experiences with population-level issues and issues related to the health system.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 110-113 |
| Number of pages | 0 |
| Journal | Indian J Med Ethics |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Community Participation
- Decision Making
- Health Equity
- Health Priorities
- Health Services Needs and Demand
- Humans
- India
- Public Health
- Research
- Vulnerable Populations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ethics and equity in research priority-setting: stakeholder engagement and the needs of disadvantaged groups.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver