Abstract
Research with young children presents ethical and methodological challenges, requiring approaches that are authentic, respectful, and developmentally responsive. Participatory methods must prioritise child agency while addressing informed consent, children's right to withdraw, and minimising adult-imposed agendas.
This study, conducted with 19 children aged three to four in two preschools in South West England, explored preschoolers' feelings towards nature through an interpretivist paradigm. Employing the Mosaic approach to operationalise participatory principles, the methodology integrated naturalistic observation, children's drawings, child-led tours, photography, teacher interviews, and parent surveys. Child-led methods, particularly tours and photography, enabled non-verbal expression and autonomy, yet surfaced ethical tensions around privacy, consent, and interpretation. While traditional methods like parent and teacher interviews provided contextual depth, they risked overshadowing children's own voices.
Authentic interpretation remained challenging, as adult perspectives inevitably filtered findings; involving children in data analysis can enhance authenticity but introduces further complexities. The study demonstrates that ethical research with young children requires continuously balancing methodological rigour with respect for child agency, avoiding tokenism while acknowledging that complete child control presents ongoing difficulties. Ultimately, child-centred research demands flexible, reflexive approaches that navigate, rather than resolve, inherent ethical and methodological tensions.
This study, conducted with 19 children aged three to four in two preschools in South West England, explored preschoolers' feelings towards nature through an interpretivist paradigm. Employing the Mosaic approach to operationalise participatory principles, the methodology integrated naturalistic observation, children's drawings, child-led tours, photography, teacher interviews, and parent surveys. Child-led methods, particularly tours and photography, enabled non-verbal expression and autonomy, yet surfaced ethical tensions around privacy, consent, and interpretation. While traditional methods like parent and teacher interviews provided contextual depth, they risked overshadowing children's own voices.
Authentic interpretation remained challenging, as adult perspectives inevitably filtered findings; involving children in data analysis can enhance authenticity but introduces further complexities. The study demonstrates that ethical research with young children requires continuously balancing methodological rigour with respect for child agency, avoiding tokenism while acknowledging that complete child control presents ongoing difficulties. Ultimately, child-centred research demands flexible, reflexive approaches that navigate, rather than resolve, inherent ethical and methodological tensions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Partizipative Forschung mit Kindern in der Grundschule |
| Subtitle of host publication | Ethische Herausforderungen und Potenziale |
| Editors | Katrin Velten, Birgit Hüpping |
| Place of Publication | Bad Heilbrunn, Germany |
| Publisher | Verlag Julius Klinkhardt |
| Chapter | IV |
| Pages | 148-153 |
| Edition | 1 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783781562202 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-3-7815-2758-4 |
| Publication status | Published - 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Research ethics
- Mosaic approach
- Early Childhood
- Participatory research
- Children's rights
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ethical and meaningful research with young children about their care for nature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Student theses
-
“Flies don't make honey": An exploration of preschoolers’ feelings and actions towards nature
Paal, K. (Author), Campbell Barr, V. (Director of Studies (First Supervisor)), Warwick, P. (Other Supervisor) & Passy, R. (Other Supervisor), 2025Student thesis: PhD
File
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver