Abstract
Environmental justice arguments focused on improving the quality of life of the poor contend that environmental 'bads' are more often located in areas of social disadvantage. In relation to waste facilities such claims of distributional outcomes have been enhanced by epidemiological analyses of apparent disease clusters in the vicinity. While politically engaging these arguments have been supported rarely by robust evidence. However, if repositioned in more structural issues related to the unequal societal distribution of power, resources and environmental burdens, they do prompt questions about the processes by which equitable decisions are made in a sustainable waste management context. The paper discusses the scientific and institutional barriers affecting the effective balancing of equity issues, arguing that while deliberative processes potentially challenge 'expert black-boxing' they also challenge current political and regulatory structures for waste management.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 397-409 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Local Environment |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2005 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law