English-learning one- to two-year-olds do not show a consonant bias in word learning.

Caroline Floccia*, Thierry Nazzi, Luche C Delle, Silvana Poltrock, Jeremy Goslin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Following the proposal that consonants are more involved than vowels in coding the lexicon (Nespor, Peña & Mehler, 2003), an early lexical consonant bias was found from age 1;2 in French but an equal sensitivity to consonants and vowels from 1;0 to 2;0 in English. As different tasks were used in French and English, we sought to clarify this ambiguity by using an interactive word-learning study similar to that used in French, with British-English-learning toddlers aged 1;4 and 1;11. Children were taught two CVC labels differing on either a consonant or vowel and tested on their pairing of a third object named with one of the previously taught labels, or part of them. In concert with previous research on British-English toddlers, our results provided no evidence of a general consonant bias. The language-specific mechanisms explaining the differential status for consonants and vowels in lexical development are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1085-1114
Number of pages0
JournalJ Child Lang
Volume41
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2014

Keywords

  • Child Language
  • Child
  • Preschool
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Language
  • Language Development
  • Learning
  • Male
  • Phonetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'English-learning one- to two-year-olds do not show a consonant bias in word learning.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this