Abstract
When a pregnancy ends in England and Wales, statutory time away from paid employment is limited to circumstances where there is a live birth or stillbirth. Forms of leave, such as Maternity Leave or Paternity Leave, depend on parental status derived from the civil registration of a new person or a post-viability stillbirth. Other early pregnancy endings, such as miscarriage or abortion, do not provide specific time off work after pregnancy. This paper uses the concept of reproductive governance to analyze current and shifting biopolitical truth discourses, strategies of intervention, and modes of subjectification around post-pregnancy leaves. It shows how different inclusions and exclusions are generated by the classificatory boundaries which act as political technologies in this field. Contributing to an area that is under-researched in the literature, we provide a review of post-pregnancy statutory employment leave entitlements in this context. We then consider proposals for change presented in the United Kingdom political system in relation to more inclusive leave benefits offered by some employers and different pregnancy ending leaves offered in other jurisdictions. We argue that current arrangements and proposals do not adequately reflect the complexity and diversity of pregnancy endings. We conclude with a call to policymakers in all contexts to carefully assess the consequences of new ideas around leaves for pregnancy endings and to formulate inclusive and fair proposals for change.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 75-91 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Gender, Work & Organization |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 8 Aug 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 11 Dec 2023 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Gender Studies
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Keywords
- abortion
- biopolitics
- employment leave
- miscarriage
- reproductive governance