TY - JOUR
T1 - Embedding interdisciplinary learning into the first-year undergraduate curriculum
T2 - drivers and barriers in a cross-institutional enhancement project
AU - Turner, Rebecca
AU - Cotton, Debby
AU - Morrison, David
AU - Kneale, Pauline
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022/4/5
Y1 - 2022/4/5
N2 - Engaging with interdisciplinary learning during higher education (HE) study can provide students with skills and modes of thinking informed by multiple worldviews. Opportunities for interdisciplinary learning in the English HE system are limited; associated primarily with postgraduate study or later undergraduate stages. This paper reports on an enhancement project that sought to engage first-year students with interdisciplinary learning. Drawing on data gathered from staff interviews, student focus groups and module enrolments, we examine drivers and barriers impacting on the planned curriculum transformation. Whilst drivers emerged from many directions (e.g. professional bodies, staff advocates), these were overwhelmed by the barriers–both administrative and ideological. Student responses were mixed. Some would have liked a wider choice of truly interdisciplinary modules, but it was clear many students did not understand the rationale for the modules and felt that they needed more support to participate.
AB - Engaging with interdisciplinary learning during higher education (HE) study can provide students with skills and modes of thinking informed by multiple worldviews. Opportunities for interdisciplinary learning in the English HE system are limited; associated primarily with postgraduate study or later undergraduate stages. This paper reports on an enhancement project that sought to engage first-year students with interdisciplinary learning. Drawing on data gathered from staff interviews, student focus groups and module enrolments, we examine drivers and barriers impacting on the planned curriculum transformation. Whilst drivers emerged from many directions (e.g. professional bodies, staff advocates), these were overwhelmed by the barriers–both administrative and ideological. Student responses were mixed. Some would have liked a wider choice of truly interdisciplinary modules, but it was clear many students did not understand the rationale for the modules and felt that they needed more support to participate.
KW - academics
KW - curriculum change
KW - first-year experience
KW - Interdisciplinarity
KW - student choice
KW - student induction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129139725&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/context/professional-research/article/1018/viewcontent/Plymouth_Plus_Prep_print_accepted_.pdf
U2 - 10.1080/13562517.2022.2056834
DO - 10.1080/13562517.2022.2056834
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85129139725
SN - 1356-2517
VL - 29
SP - 1092
EP - 1108
JO - Teaching in Higher Education
JF - Teaching in Higher Education
IS - 4
ER -