Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Elbasvir/grazoprevir and sofosbuvir for hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infection with compensated cirrhosis: A randomized trial

  • Graham R. Foster*
  • , Kosh Agarwal
  • , Matthew E. Cramp
  • , Sulleman Moreea
  • , Stephen Barclay
  • , Jane Collier
  • , Ashley S. Brown
  • , Stephen D. Ryder
  • , Andrew Ustianowski
  • , Daniel M. Forton
  • , Ray Fox
  • , Fiona Gordon
  • , William M. Rosenberg
  • , David J. Mutimer
  • , Jiejun Du
  • , Christopher L. Gilbert
  • , E Asante‐Appiah
  • , Janice Wahl
  • , Michael N. Robertson
  • , Eliav Barr
  • Barbara Haber
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • King's College London
  • University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust
  • Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Glasgow Royal Campus
  • John Radcliffe Hospital
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Northern Care Alliance NHS Group
  • Kingston University and St George’s
  • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
  • Hepatology Joint Clinical Research Unit
  • University College London
  • QE Hospital
  • Merck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

<jats:p>Many direct‐acting antiviral regimens have reduced activity in people with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 3 infection and cirrhosis. The C‐ISLE study assessed the efficacy and safety of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) plus sofosbuvir (SOF) with and without ribavirin (RBV) in compensated cirrhotic participants with GT3 infection. This was a phase 2, randomized, open‐label study. Treatment‐naive participants received EBR/GZR + SOF + RBV for 8 weeks or EBR/GZR + SOF for 12 weeks, and peginterferon/RBV treatment‐experienced participants received EBR/GZR + SOF ± RBV for 12 weeks or EBR/GZR + SOF for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was HCV RNA &lt;15 IU/mL 12 weeks after the end of treatment (sustained virologic response at 12 weeks [SVR12]). Among treatment‐naive participants, SVR12 was 91% (21/23) in those treated with RBV for 8 weeks and 96% (23/24) in those treated for 12 weeks. Among treatment‐experienced participants, SVR12 was 94% (17/18) and 100% (17/17) in the 12‐week arm, with and without RBV, respectively, and 94% (17/18) in the 16‐week arm. Five participants failed to achieve SVR: 2 relapsed (both in the 8‐week arm), 1 discontinued due to vomiting/cellulitis (16‐week arm), and 2 discontinued (consent withdrawn/lost to follow‐up). SVR12 was not affected by the presence of resistance‐associated substitutions (RASs). There was no consistent change in insulin resistance, and 5 participants reported serious adverse events (pneumonia, chest pain, opiate overdose, cellulitis, decreased creatinine). High efficacy was demonstrated in participants with HCV GT3 infection and cirrhosis. Treatment beyond 12 weeks was not required, and efficacy was maintained regardless of baseline RASs. <jats:italic toggle="yes">Conclusion</jats:italic>: Data from this study support the use of EBR/GZR plus SOF for 12 weeks without RBV for treatment‐naive and peginterferon/RBV–experienced people with GT3 infection and cirrhosis (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02601573). (H<jats:sc>epatology</jats:sc> 2018;67:2113‐2126)</jats:p>
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2113-2126
Number of pages0
JournalHepatology
Volume67
Issue number6
Early online date19 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Elbasvir/grazoprevir and sofosbuvir for hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infection with compensated cirrhosis: A randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this