Effects of pedunculopontine nucleus stimulation on human bladder function

HA Roy, Debbie Pond, C Roy, Beth Forrow, Thomas Foltynie, Ludvic Zrinzo, Harith Akram, Tipu Z. Aziz, James J. FitzGerald, Alexander L. Green

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Aims</jats:title><jats:p>The pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) is a deep brain stimulation target for Parkinson's disease (PD). Unilateral PPN stimulation has been described in a previous case report to provoke urinary frequency, urgency and detrusor overactivity, due to probable activation of the pontine micturition center. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of bilateral PPN DBS on urodynamic parameters and to investigate the likely mechanisms using probabilistic tractography.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Six male PD subjects with bilateral PPN deep brain stimulators were recruited. Urodynamic bladder filling assessments were carried out with the stimulators ON and OFF. Two subjects also had diffusion‐weighted and T1‐weighted MRI scans performed and probabilistic tractography was carried out to describe white matter connections with the stimulated area.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Five subjects completed urodynamic testing. PPN DBS did not give rise to detrusor overactivity or lower sensory thresholds during bladder filling. However, there was a significant increase in maximal bladder capacity with stimulation: mean bladder volume at maximal capacity was 199 mL (range 103‐440) ON stimulation compared with 131 mL (range 39‐230) OFF stimulation. Tractography demonstrated extensive connectivity to cortical and subcortical regions, some of which have been implicated in bladder control. Fiber pathways also passed close to the vicinity of the pontine micturition center.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Bilateral PPN DBS did not have a detrimental effect on urodynamic filling parameters or produce detrusor overactivity, but did slightly increase maximal capacity. Possible mechanisms include long‐range connectivity or local effects at the pontine micturition center.</jats:p></jats:sec>
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)726-734
Number of pages0
JournalNeurourology and Urodynamics
Volume37
Issue number2
Early online date12 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of pedunculopontine nucleus stimulation on human bladder function'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this