Abstract
Human participants received exposure to similar visual stimuli (AW and BW) that shared a common feature (W). Experiment 1 demonstrated that subsequent discrimination between AW and BW was more accurate when the two stimuli were preexposed on an intermixed schedule (AW, BW, AW, BW…) than when they were preexposed on a blocked schedule (AW, AW…BW, BW…): the intermixed-blocked effect. Furthermore, memory for the unique features of the stimuli (A and B) was better when the stimuli were preexposed on an intermixed schedule than when they were preexposed on a blocked schedule. Conversely, memory for the common features of the stimuli (W) was better when the stimuli were preexposed on a blocked schedule than when they were preexposed on an intermixed schedule. Experiment 2 again demonstrated the intermixed-blocked effect, but participants were preexposed to the stimuli in such a way that the temporal spacing between exposures to the unique features was equated between schedules. Memory for the unique and common features was similar to that found in Experiment 1. These findings support the proposal that perceptual learning depends on a mechanism that enhances memory for the unique features and reduces memory for common features.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1123-1138 |
Number of pages | 0 |
Journal | Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) |
Volume | 65 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- Discrimination Learning
- Discrimination
- Psychological
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Neuropsychological Tests
- Pattern Recognition
- Visual
- Photic Stimulation
- Reaction Time
- Recognition
- Psychology