Effect of processing method on the mineral content of Nigerian fermented maize infant complementary food - Akamu

Patience C. Obinna-Echem*, Jane Beal, Victor Kuri

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The calcium, potassium, magnesium, sodium, phosphorus, sulphur, copper, iron, manganese and zinc content of Nigerian traditionally fermented maize food (akamu) against ground whole maize slurries fermented with Lactobacillus plantarum strains were evaluated using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES). The mineral content of the traditional akamu samples varied significantly (p < 0.05), except for calcium, sodium and zinc levels in the range of 38–70, 210–236, 6–10 mg kg−1 respectively. Calcium, potassium, magnesium, sodium, sulphur and zinc (>73, 2044, 727, 284, 765 and 16 mg kg−1 respectively) levels in the fermented ground whole maize slurries were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than levels in the akamu samples. The mean maximum values expressed as a percentage of recommended intake levels for infants ≤1 year were ≤50% except for potassium, magnesium and phosphorus in the fermented whole ground maize, iron in the traditional akamu, and copper and manganese in both. The findings of this study will be relevant in food composition values and an addition to the knowledge of dietary limitations of these minerals in akamu as well as the preference for fermentation of ground whole grain slurries against the traditional process of wet sieving and water decanting.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-151
Number of pages7
JournalLWT - Food Science and Technology
Volume61
Issue number1
Early online date11 Nov 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Nov 2014

Keywords

  • Minerals
  • Lactobacillus plantarum
  • Fermentation
  • Ground whole maize
  • Akamu

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of processing method on the mineral content of Nigerian fermented maize infant complementary food - Akamu'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this