Abstract
Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) can either protect all seabed habitats within them or discrete features. If discrete features within the MPA are to be protected humans have to know where the boundaries are. In Lyme Bay, SW England a MPA excluded towed demersal fishing gear from 206 km(2) to protect rocky reef habitats and the associated species. The site comprised a mosaic of sedimentary and reef habitats and so 'non reef' habitat also benefited from the MPA. Following 3 years protection, video data showed that sessile Reef Associated Species (RAS) had colonised sedimentary habitat indicating that 'reef' was present. This suggested that the functional extent of the reef was potentially greater than its visual boundary. Feature based MPA management may not adequately protect targeted features, whereas site based management allows for shifting baselines and will be more effective at delivering ecosystem goods and services.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 194-202 |
| Number of pages | 0 |
| Journal | Mar Pollut Bull |
| Volume | 76 |
| Issue number | 0 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 15 Nov 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 14 Life Below Water
Keywords
- Benthos
- Ecosystem
- Fisheries
- Management
- Marine Protected Area
- Recovery
- Animals
- Conservation of Natural Resources
- England
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Drawing lines at the sand: evidence for functional vs. visual reef boundaries in temperate Marine Protected Areas.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver