Drawing lines at the sand: evidence for functional vs. visual reef boundaries in temperate Marine Protected Areas.

E. V. Sheehan*, S. L. Cousens, S. J. Nancollas, C. Stauss, J. Royle, M. J. Attrill

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) can either protect all seabed habitats within them or discrete features. If discrete features within the MPA are to be protected humans have to know where the boundaries are. In Lyme Bay, SW England a MPA excluded towed demersal fishing gear from 206 km(2) to protect rocky reef habitats and the associated species. The site comprised a mosaic of sedimentary and reef habitats and so 'non reef' habitat also benefited from the MPA. Following 3 years protection, video data showed that sessile Reef Associated Species (RAS) had colonised sedimentary habitat indicating that 'reef' was present. This suggested that the functional extent of the reef was potentially greater than its visual boundary. Feature based MPA management may not adequately protect targeted features, whereas site based management allows for shifting baselines and will be more effective at delivering ecosystem goods and services.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)194-202
Number of pages0
JournalMar Pollut Bull
Volume76
Issue number0
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Nov 2013

Keywords

  • Benthos
  • Ecosystem
  • Fisheries
  • Management
  • Marine Protected Area
  • Recovery
  • Animals
  • Conservation of Natural Resources
  • England

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Drawing lines at the sand: evidence for functional vs. visual reef boundaries in temperate Marine Protected Areas.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this