TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing transmissible vaccines for animal infections
AU - Streicker, Daniel G.
AU - Griffiths, Megan E.
AU - Antia, Rustom
AU - Bergner, Laura
AU - Bowman, Peter
AU - de Moraes, Maria Vitoria dos Santos
AU - Esvelt, Kevin
AU - Famulare, Mike
AU - Gilbert, Amy
AU - He, Biao
AU - Jarvis, Michael A.
AU - Kennedy, David A.
AU - Kuzma, Jennifer
AU - Wanyonyi, Carolyne Nasimiyu
AU - Remien, Christopher
AU - Rocke, Tonie
AU - Rosenke, Kyle
AU - Schreiner, Courtney
AU - Sheen, Justin
AU - Simons, David
AU - Yordanova, Ivet A.
AU - Bull, James J.
AU - Nuismer, Scott L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Association for the Advancement of Science. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/4/19
Y1 - 2024/4/19
N2 - Many emerging and reemerging pathogens originate from wildlife, but nearly all wild species are unreachable using conventional vaccination, which requires capture of and vaccine administration to individual animals. By enabling immunization at scales sufficient to interrupt pathogen transmission, transmissible vaccines (TVs) that spread themselves through wildlife populations by infectious processes could potentially transform the management of otherwise intractable challenges to public health, wildlife conservation, and animal welfare. However, generating TVs likely requires modifying viruses that would be intended to spread in nature, which raises concerns ranging from technical feasibility, to safety and security risks, to regulatory uncertainties (1, 2). We propose a series of commitments and strategies for vaccine development—beginning with a priori decisions on vaccine design and continuing through to stakeholder codevelopment [see supplementary materials (SM)]—that we believe increase the likelihood that the potential risks of vaccine transmission are outweighed by benefits to conservation, animal welfare, and zoonosis prevention.
AB - Many emerging and reemerging pathogens originate from wildlife, but nearly all wild species are unreachable using conventional vaccination, which requires capture of and vaccine administration to individual animals. By enabling immunization at scales sufficient to interrupt pathogen transmission, transmissible vaccines (TVs) that spread themselves through wildlife populations by infectious processes could potentially transform the management of otherwise intractable challenges to public health, wildlife conservation, and animal welfare. However, generating TVs likely requires modifying viruses that would be intended to spread in nature, which raises concerns ranging from technical feasibility, to safety and security risks, to regulatory uncertainties (1, 2). We propose a series of commitments and strategies for vaccine development—beginning with a priori decisions on vaccine design and continuing through to stakeholder codevelopment [see supplementary materials (SM)]—that we believe increase the likelihood that the potential risks of vaccine transmission are outweighed by benefits to conservation, animal welfare, and zoonosis prevention.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85191618067&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1126/science.adn3231
DO - 10.1126/science.adn3231
M3 - Article
C2 - 38669579
AN - SCOPUS:85191618067
SN - 0036-8075
VL - 384
SP - 275
EP - 277
JO - Science
JF - Science
IS - 6693
ER -