Desperately seeking outcomes: Quantifying the effectiveness of community mental healthcare using Health of the Nation Outcome Scales

Richard Laugharne*, Scott Eaves, Alin Mascas, Kiki Psatha, Gill Dinnis, Jonathan Trower, Rohit Shankar

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Community mental health services in the UK have struggled to measure the clinical effectiveness of their services.Aims To measure clinical outcomes for different diagnostic clusters.Method Clinicians measure the clinical status of patients by the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS), and HoNOS scores should be recorded annually after treatment. Clinical outcomes were measured by changes in HoNOS for diagnostic clusters.Results In two time periods (2014 and 2016), the health of patients with mild to moderate common mental disorders deteriorated after intervention. Patients with severe common mental disorders and psychoses improved in their clinical status.Conclusions British community mental health teams may be effective in improving the clinical status of people with severe mental illness, but may have a negative effect on people with mild to moderate illnesses. These teams need to focus on the severely mentally ill and build on this demonstrable effectiveness.Declaration of interest None.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-94
Number of pages4
JournalBJPsych Open
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Desperately seeking outcomes: Quantifying the effectiveness of community mental healthcare using Health of the Nation Outcome Scales'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this