Crucial role for human Toll-like receptor 4 in the development of contact allergy to nickel.

  • Marc Schmidt
  • , Badrinarayanan Raghavan
  • , Verena Müller
  • , Thomas Vogl
  • , György Fejer
  • , Sandrine Tchaptchet
  • , Simone Keck
  • , Christoph Kalis
  • , Peter J. Nielsen
  • , Chris Galanos
  • , Johannes Roth
  • , Arne Skerra
  • , Stefan F. Martin
  • , Marina A. Freudenberg
  • , Matthias Goebeler*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Allergies to nickel (Ni(2+)) are the most frequent cause of contact hypersensitivity (CHS) in industrialized countries. The efficient development of CHS requires both a T lymphocyte-specific signal and a proinflammatory signal. Here we show that Ni(2+) triggered an inflammatory response by directly activating human Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). Ni(2+)-induced TLR4 activation was species-specific, as mouse TLR4 could not generate this response. Studies with mutant TLR4 proteins revealed that the non-conserved histidines 456 and 458 of human TLR4 are required for activation by Ni(2+) but not by the natural ligand lipopolysaccharide. Accordingly, transgenic expression of human TLR4 in TLR4-deficient mice allowed efficient sensitization to Ni(2+) and elicitation of CHS. Our data implicate site-specific human TLR4 inhibition as a potential strategy for therapeutic intervention in CHS that would not affect vital immune responses.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)814-819
Number of pages0
JournalNat Immunol
Volume11
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2010

Keywords

  • Amino Acid Sequence
  • Animals
  • Dermatitis
  • Contact
  • Disease Models
  • Animal
  • Humans
  • Mice
  • Transgenic
  • Models
  • Molecular
  • Molecular Sequence Data
  • Nickel
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Signal Transduction
  • Toll-Like Receptor 4

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Crucial role for human Toll-like receptor 4 in the development of contact allergy to nickel.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this