Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 451-479 |
Number of pages | 0 |
Journal | Psychological Bulletin |
Volume | 146 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | May 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2020 |
Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results.
Justin F. Landy*, ML Jia, Isabel L. Ding, Domenico Viganola, Warren Tierney, Anna Dreber, Magnus Johannesson, Thomas Pfeiffer, Charles R. Ebersole, Quentin F. Gronau, A Ly, den Bergh D van, Maarten Marsman, Koen Derks, E-J Wagenmakers, Andrew Proctor, Daniel M. Bartels, Christopher W. Bauman, William J. Brady, F Cheung
*Corresponding author for this work
- Nova Southeastern University
- National University of Singapore
- George Mason University
- University of Limerick
- Stockholm School of Economics
- University of Innsbruck
- Massey University
- University of Kassel
- University of Virginia
- University of Amsterdam
- Roehampton University
- Nyenrode Business University
- University of Bremen
- The University of Chicago
- University of California at Irvine
- New York University
- University of Cologne
- Michigan State University
- University of Oslo
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Universidad de los Andes Colombia
- University of Andes
- University of Bamberg
- Stanford University
- San Jose State University
- Renmin Business School
- Renmin University of China
- Western Kentucky University
- University of Denver
- Duke University
- HarrisX
- New York Yankees
- Hainan University
- Tsinghua University
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
- University of Toronto
- ESMT Berlin
- University of Miami
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
27
Downloads
(Pure)