Coronary thrombolysis: still too little too late?

J Pinkney, S Catnach, A Woods, P Fairclough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We reviewed the case records of 109 consecutive patients with a definite diagnosis of myocardial infarction, admitted through the accident and emergency department of an inner-city general hospital to identify delays in referral to hospital, admission to the coronary care unit, and start of thrombolysis. Of the 109 patients, only 28 (26%) received streptokinase (the only thrombolytic drug used at this hospital), and at least 47 (58%) of the remaining 81 who should have benefited from it did not. However, the proportion of patients given streptokinase improved significantly after publication of the Second International Study of Infarct Survival (ISIS 2) study results. The average delay from onset of symptoms to presentation at the accident department was over 3 hours, with a further 1 hour in-hospital delay before administration of streptokinase. This study revealed considerable underuse of thrombolytic therapy in cases where treatment was clearly indicated, but this picture improved substantially during the period of audit.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)132-134
Number of pages0
JournalHealth Trends
Volume25
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1993

Keywords

  • Clinical Protocols
  • Coronary Care Units
  • Emergency Service
  • Hospital
  • Female
  • Humans
  • London
  • Male
  • Medical Audit
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Patient Admission
  • Streptokinase
  • Time Factors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coronary thrombolysis: still too little too late?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this