TY - JOUR
T1 - Core GRADE 7
T2 - Principles for moving from evidence to recommendations and decisions
AU - Guyatt, Gordon
AU - Vandvik, Per Olav
AU - Iorio, Alfonso
AU - Agarwal, Arnav
AU - Yao, Liang
AU - Eachempati, Prashanti
AU - Zeng, Linan
AU - Chu, Derek K.
AU - D'Souza, Rohan
AU - Agoritsas, Thomas
AU - Hassan Murad, M.
AU - Schandelmaier, Stefan
AU - Rylance, Jamie
AU - Djulbegovic, Benjamin
AU - Montori, Victor M.
AU - Hultcrantz, Monica
AU - Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/6/3
Y1 - 2025/6/3
N2 - This seventh article in a seven part series presents the Core GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach for moving from evidence to recommendations or policy decisions. Core GRADE users make strong recommendations for an intervention versus a comparator when the desirable consequences clearly outweigh the undesirable consequences, and a conditional (weak) recommendation when the balance is less clear. Primary considerations in deciding on recommendations considering an individual patient perspective include balance of benefits, harms, and burdens; the certainty of evidence; and values and preferences. Secondary considerations, most important from a population perspective, include costs, feasibility, acceptability, and equity. Moving from evidence to recommendations begins with considering evidence regarding patients' values and preferences and choosing the smallest difference in each outcome that patients perceive as important (the minimal important difference). Core GRADE users construct statements that make clear the values and preferences underlying their recommendations. In general, Core GRADE users make strong recommendations only when certainty of evidence is high or moderate. When evidence certainty is low, recommendations will be conditional under all but special circumstances.
AB - This seventh article in a seven part series presents the Core GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach for moving from evidence to recommendations or policy decisions. Core GRADE users make strong recommendations for an intervention versus a comparator when the desirable consequences clearly outweigh the undesirable consequences, and a conditional (weak) recommendation when the balance is less clear. Primary considerations in deciding on recommendations considering an individual patient perspective include balance of benefits, harms, and burdens; the certainty of evidence; and values and preferences. Secondary considerations, most important from a population perspective, include costs, feasibility, acceptability, and equity. Moving from evidence to recommendations begins with considering evidence regarding patients' values and preferences and choosing the smallest difference in each outcome that patients perceive as important (the minimal important difference). Core GRADE users construct statements that make clear the values and preferences underlying their recommendations. In general, Core GRADE users make strong recommendations only when certainty of evidence is high or moderate. When evidence certainty is low, recommendations will be conditional under all but special circumstances.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105007992313
UR - https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/pds-research/396/
U2 - 10.1136/bmj-2024-083867
DO - 10.1136/bmj-2024-083867
M3 - Article
C2 - 40461180
AN - SCOPUS:105007992313
SN - 0959-8146
VL - 389
JO - BMJ
JF - BMJ
M1 - e083867
ER -