Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Core GRADE 7: Principles for moving from evidence to recommendations and decisions

  • Gordon Guyatt*
  • , Per Olav Vandvik
  • , Alfonso Iorio
  • , Arnav Agarwal
  • , Liang Yao
  • , Prashanti Eachempati
  • , Linan Zeng
  • , Derek K. Chu
  • , Rohan D'Souza
  • , Thomas Agoritsas
  • , M. Hassan Murad
  • , Stefan Schandelmaier
  • , Jamie Rylance
  • , Benjamin Djulbegovic
  • , Victor M. Montori
  • , Monica Hultcrantz
  • , Romina Brignardello-Petersen
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • McMaster University
  • MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation
  • University of Oslo
  • Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine
  • Manipal Academy of Higher Education
  • Sichuan University
  • University of Geneva
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • University of Basel
  • University College Cork
  • University of Pecs
  • Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • HTA Region Stockholm
  • Karolinska Institutet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This seventh article in a seven part series presents the Core GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach for moving from evidence to recommendations or policy decisions. Core GRADE users make strong recommendations for an intervention versus a comparator when the desirable consequences clearly outweigh the undesirable consequences, and a conditional (weak) recommendation when the balance is less clear. Primary considerations in deciding on recommendations considering an individual patient perspective include balance of benefits, harms, and burdens; the certainty of evidence; and values and preferences. Secondary considerations, most important from a population perspective, include costs, feasibility, acceptability, and equity. Moving from evidence to recommendations begins with considering evidence regarding patients' values and preferences and choosing the smallest difference in each outcome that patients perceive as important (the minimal important difference). Core GRADE users construct statements that make clear the values and preferences underlying their recommendations. In general, Core GRADE users make strong recommendations only when certainty of evidence is high or moderate. When evidence certainty is low, recommendations will be conditional under all but special circumstances.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere083867
JournalBMJ
Volume389
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jun 2025

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Core GRADE 7: Principles for moving from evidence to recommendations and decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this