TY - JOUR
T1 - Core GRADE 4: rating certainty of evidence—risk of bias, publication bias, and reasons for rating up certainty
AU - Guyatt, Gordon
AU - Wang, Ying
AU - Eachempati, Prashanti
AU - Iorio, Alfonso
AU - Murad, M. Hassan
AU - Hultcrantz, Monica
AU - Chu, Derek K.
AU - Florez, Ivan D.
AU - Hemkens, Lars G.
AU - Agoritsas, Thomas
AU - Yao, Liang
AU - Vandvik, Per Olav
AU - Montori, Victor M.
AU - Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025.
PY - 2025/5/13
Y1 - 2025/5/13
N2 - This fourth article in a seven part series presents the Core GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to addressing risk of bias, publication bias, and rating up certainty. In Core GRADE, randomised controlled trials begin as high certainty evidence and non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSI) as low certainty. To assess certainty of evidence for risk of bias, Core GRADE users first classify individual studies as low or high risk of bias. Decisions regarding rating down for risk of bias will depend on the weights of high and low risk of bias studies and similarities or differences between the results of high and low risk of bias studies. For publication bias, a body of evidence comprising small studies funded by industry should raise suspicion. Core GRADE users appraising results from well conducted NSRI can consider rating up certainty of evidence when risk ratios from pooled estimates suggest large or very large effects.
AB - This fourth article in a seven part series presents the Core GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to addressing risk of bias, publication bias, and rating up certainty. In Core GRADE, randomised controlled trials begin as high certainty evidence and non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSI) as low certainty. To assess certainty of evidence for risk of bias, Core GRADE users first classify individual studies as low or high risk of bias. Decisions regarding rating down for risk of bias will depend on the weights of high and low risk of bias studies and similarities or differences between the results of high and low risk of bias studies. For publication bias, a body of evidence comprising small studies funded by industry should raise suspicion. Core GRADE users appraising results from well conducted NSRI can consider rating up certainty of evidence when risk ratios from pooled estimates suggest large or very large effects.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105005474690
UR - https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/pds-research/349/
U2 - 10.1136/bmj-2024-083864
DO - 10.1136/bmj-2024-083864
M3 - Article
C2 - 40360206
AN - SCOPUS:105005474690
SN - 0959-8146
VL - 389
JO - The BMJ
JF - The BMJ
M1 - e083864
ER -