Core GRADE 1: overview of the Core GRADE approach

Gordon Guyatt*, Thomas Agoritsas, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Reem A. Mustafa, Jamie Rylance, Farid Foroutan, Manya Prasad, Arnav Agarwal, Hans De Beer, M. Hassan Murad, Stefan Schandelmaier, Alfonso Iorio, Liang Yao, Roman Jaeschke, Per Olav Vandvik, Linan Zeng, Sameer Parpia, Rohan D'souza, David Rind, Derek K. ChuPrashanti Eachempati, Kameshwar Prasad, Monica Hultcrantz, Victor M. Montori

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This first article in a seven part series presents an overview of the essential elements of the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach that has proved extremely useful in systematic reviews, health technology assessment reports, and clinical practice guidelines. GRADE guidance has appeared in many articles dealing with both core issues and more specialised and complex guidance, and it has evolved over time. This series of articles presents GRADE essentials, Core GRADE, focusing on the core judgments necessary to summarise the comparative evidence about alternative care options and to make recommendations that apply to the care of individual patients. This article presents detailed guidance on formulating questions using the PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) structure, and refining the question considering possible differences in relative and absolute effects across patient groups. The article then provides an overview of the remainder of the Core GRADE approach, including decisions about the certainty of the evidence and considerations in moving from evidence to guidance and recommendations.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere081903
JournalBMJ
Volume389
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Apr 2025

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Core GRADE 1: overview of the Core GRADE approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this