Containment of COVID-19: Simulating the impact of different policies and testing capacities for contact tracing, testing, and isolation

Vincenzo G. Fiore*, Nicholas DeFelice, Benjamin S. Glicksberg, Ofer Perl, Anastasia Shuster, Kaustubh Kulkarni, Madeline O'Brien, M. Andrea Pisauro, Dongil Chung, Xiaosi Gu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Efficient contact tracing and testing are fundamental tools to contain the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. We used multi-agent simulations to estimate the daily testing capacity required to find and isolate a number of infected agents sufficient to break the chain of transmission of SARS-CoV-2, so decreasing the risk of new waves of infections. Depending on the non-pharmaceutical mitigation policies in place, the size of secondary infection clusters allowed or the percentage of asymptomatic and paucisymptomatic (i.e., subclinical) infections, we estimated that the daily testing capacity required to contain the disease varies between 0.7 and 9.1 tests per thousand agents in the population. However, we also found that if contact tracing and testing efficacy dropped below 60% (e.g. due to false negatives or reduced tracing capability), the number of new daily infections did not always decrease and could even increase exponentially, irrespective of the testing capacity. Under these conditions, we show that population-level information about geographical distribution and travel behaviour could inform sampling policies to aid a successful containment, while avoiding concerns about government-controlled mass surveillance.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0247614
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume16
Issue number3 March 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Multidisciplinary

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Containment of COVID-19: Simulating the impact of different policies and testing capacities for contact tracing, testing, and isolation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this