Competition between an avoidance response and a safety signal: evidence for a single learning system.

Peter F. Lovibond*, Shirley X. Chen, Christopher J. Mitchell, Gabrielle Weidemann

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Two experiments examined competition between an instrumental avoidance response and a Pavlovian safety signal for association with omission of electric shock in a human fear conditioning paradigm. Self-reported shock expectancies and skin conductance responses were consistent with blocking of learning of the instrumental contingency by prior training of the Pavlovian contingency, and vice versa. The results support the idea that a common learning mechanism underlies both Pavlovian and instrumental conditioning. The expectancy data suggest that this learning mechanism is cognitive in nature, and that Pavlovian and instrumental learning involve external and internal attributions, respectively. The procedure may thus serve as a laboratory model for attributional processes involved in the acquisition of threat expectancies in anxiety and anxiety disorders.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-16
Number of pages0
JournalBiol Psychol
Volume92
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013

Keywords

  • Acoustic Stimulation
  • Avoidance Learning
  • Conditioning
  • Classical
  • Operant
  • Electroshock
  • Fear
  • Female
  • Galvanic Skin Response
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal Detection
  • Psychological
  • Students
  • Universities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Competition between an avoidance response and a safety signal: evidence for a single learning system.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this