Comparison of methodologies for the detection of BRAF mutations in bone marrow trephine specimens

Beatrix Cardus, Richard Colling*, Angela Hamblin, Elizabeth Soilleux

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aims BRAF V600E detection assists in the diagnosis of hairy cell leukaemia (HCL); however, testing practices vary. We evaluated the clinical utility of 5 BRAF mutation testing strategies for use on bone marrow trephines (BMT). Methods 11 HCL, 5 HCL a € mimic', 2 treated HCL and 10 normal BMT specimens were tested for mutant BRAF, comparing Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, amplicon-based next generation sequencing (NGS), automated (Idylla) PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results PCR and IHC were cheaper and identified V600E in 100 % of HCL cases. Pyrosequencing detected the mutation in 91%, NGS in 55% of cases and Sanger sequencing in 27%. All assays gave wild-type BRAF results in HCL mimics and normal BMT samples. Conclusions PCR and IHC were most sensitive and cost-effective, but these have limited scope for multiplexing and are likely to be replaced by NGS gene panels or whole genome sequencing in the medium to long term.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)406-411
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Pathology
Volume72
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Keywords

  • bone marrow
  • BRAF
  • Hairy cell leukaemia
  • immunohistochemistry
  • molecular pathology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of methodologies for the detection of BRAF mutations in bone marrow trephine specimens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this