Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of tidal stream turbine blades

Stuart R.J. Walker, Philipp R. Thies, Lars Johanning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Renewable energy allows electricity generation with lower environmental and resource impact than generation from fossil fuels. However, the manufacture, use and ultimate disposal of the equipment used to capture this energy has an environmental impact, which should be minimised. Tidal turbine blades are currently primarily manufactured from glass-fibre reinforced polymers. Such blades cannot be recycled at the end of their life, and are disposed of in landfill or by incineration. As the tidal energy industry grows, the volume of non-recyclable waste is a potential problem. Here we consider the environmental impact of ten combinations of material and disposal method for tidal stream turbine blades, including recyclable options. Our findings suggest that glass fibre blades have greenhouse gas emissions of around 15,500 kgCO2e for the scope considered, and a significant environmental impact in all impact categories, which would be increased by changing to carbon fibre (99% mean increase from glass fibre across impact categories) or steel (134% mean increase from glass fibre across impact categories) blades, but that composite materials using flax fibre and recyclable resin may have lower impact (26% mean decrease from glass fibre across impact categories), provided they are treated correctly after use. These materials may also offer the potential for lower cost blades in future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-256
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Marine Energy Journal
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Dec 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oceanography
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Ocean Engineering

Keywords

  • Carbon footprint
  • Cost
  • Environmental impact
  • Life Cycle Assessment
  • Tidal turbine blades

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of tidal stream turbine blades'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this