Collective order and group structure of shoaling fish subject to differing risk-level treatments with a sympatric predator

Timothy M. Schaerf*, Alexander D.M. Wilson, Mitchell Welch, Ashley J.W. Ward

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

It is imperative for individuals to exhibit flexible behaviour according to ecological context, such as available resources or predation threat. Manipulative studies on responses to threat often focus on behaviour in the presence of a single indicator for the potential of predation, whereas in the wild perception of threat will probably be more nuanced. Here, we examine the collective behaviour of eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) subject to five differing threat scenarios relating to the presence and hunger state of a jade perch (Scortum barcoo). Across threat scenarios, groups exhibit unique behavioural profiles that differ in the durations that particular collective states are maintained, the probability of transitions between states, the size and duration of persistence of spatially defined subgroups, and the patterns of collective order of these subgroups. Under the greatest level of threat, subgroups of consistent membership persist for longer durations. Group-level behaviours, and their differences, are interconnected with differences in estimates of the underlying rules of interaction thought to govern collective motion. The responses of the group are shown to be specific to the details of a potential threat, rather than a binary response to the presence or absence of some form of threat.

Original languageEnglish
Article number231511
JournalRoyal Society Open Science
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 May 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Multidisciplinary

Keywords

  • collective movement
  • Gambusia holbrooki
  • group order
  • predator-prey
  • rules of interaction
  • threat

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Collective order and group structure of shoaling fish subject to differing risk-level treatments with a sympatric predator'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this