(C)old beginnings and technologies of rectification in early years education: the implications for teachers and children with special educational needs

Elizabeth J. Done*, Mandy J. Andrews, Clare Evenden

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    15 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This paper considers varied governmental initiatives in England and their implications for early years education, including: an Office for Standards in Education (2017. Bold Beginnings: The Reception Curriculum in a Sample of Good and Outstanding Primary Schools. Manchester: Ofsted) report entitled ‘Bold beginnings’ proposing curriculum changes in Reception teaching based on identified features of a small number of ‘good’ and ‘outstanding’ schools; Department of Education (2014. Early Years: Guide to the 0–25 SEND Code of Practice. London: DfE) advice for early years providers on special educational needs; and proposals from the same department for a single statutory baseline test in Reception. All assume a linear model of child development conceived as ‘progress’ and reflect moves to codify all aspects of child learning and early years professional practice. An alternative view of early years education drawn from poststructuralism is suggested here that affords more scope for intuitive practice and professional judgement in a child-centred approach.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalInternational Journal of Early Years Education
    Early online date15 Nov 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Nov 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '(C)old beginnings and technologies of rectification in early years education: the implications for teachers and children with special educational needs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this