TY - JOUR
T1 - Causes of Prolonged Cold Ischemia Time After Arrival of Deceased Donor Kidney at Implanting Center
T2 - Results From a Prospective Audit
AU - Mujeeb, Mariyam
AU - Borbas, Balint
AU - Tanase, Andrei
AU - Sandhu, Bynvant
AU - Barnett, Nicholas
AU - Zakri, Rhana
AU - Dabare, Dilan
AU - Patel, Kamlesh
AU - Okafor, Ugochukwu
AU - Ayorinde, Tobi
AU - Chan, Abigail
AU - Hanji, Suresh
AU - Motallebzadeh, Reza
AU - Alawad, Awad
AU - Brooker, Verity
AU - Chalklin, Christopher
AU - Gupta, Sapna
AU - Szabo, Laszlo
AU - Malik, Ahmed
AU - Mustafa, Omer
AU - Ghazanfar, Abbas
AU - Soliman, Haitham
AU - Storey, Rowland
AU - Petrosius, Gintaras
AU - Tariq, Khadija
AU - Boffa, Catherine
AU - Sutaria, Rupesh
AU - Gopal, Jeevan
AU - Khambalia, Hussein
AU - Moinuddin, Zia
AU - Prabakaran, Viswakumar
AU - Khattab, Rania
AU - Amer, Aimen
AU - Martin, Laura
AU - Houston, Susannah
AU - Jackson, Andrew
AU - Mayaleh, Sameh
AU - Rizzello, Anna
AU - Shankar, Sushma
AU - Sinha, Sanjay
AU - Arachchige, Sachith
AU - Konstantinou, Charalampos
AU - Muhammad, Kama
AU - O'Callaghan, John
AU - Hamaoui, Karim
AU - Russel, Neil
AU - Aroori, Somaiah
N1 - © 2025 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2025/8
Y1 - 2025/8
N2 - BACKGROUND: Deceased donor kidney transplants often face delays, leading to prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT), yet data on post-allograft arrival delays are scarce.OBJECTIVES: This audit aims to identify and characterize the delays contributing to CIT prolongation after allograft arrival at the implanting center.DESIGN: Data was collected prospectively from 14 UK centers between February and September 2022. Timelines from allograft arrival to the implanting center to implantation were recorded for adult deceased donor kidney-only transplants.RESULTS: The median CIT for all 446 allografts [(donation after cardiac death (DCD), 48.2% and donation after brain death (DBD), 51.6%)] was 11:08 h (interquartile range (IQR): 08:15-15:12). A total of 42% of DCD and 15% of DBD allografts exceeded the national recommended duration of 12 and 18 h, respectively. CIT was prolonged in centers with dedicated transplant theaters, with a median CIT of 13:41 (IQR: 08:11-15:13) compared to a median CIT of 09:43 (IQR: 07:36-12:29) hours (p < 0.005, 95% CI: -4.40, -2.60) in centers without dedicated transplant theaters. Compared to full cross-match (FXM) results, a higher proportion of Virtual cross-match (VXM) results (75.2% vs. 89.4%, Odds Ratio (OR): 2.79, CI: 1.57-5.0, p < 0.005) were available before the allograft arrived at the implanting center. The proportion of crossmatch results available before the recipient's arrival at the implanting center was 31.7% (46.6% for VXM vs. 4.9% for FXM, OR: 16.76, CI: 7.50, 44.17, p < 0.005). However, no difference was found in CIT between the VXM (median: 11:06, IQR: 08:14-15:20) and FXM (median: 11:00, IQR: 08:34-14:56) groups (p = 0.75, CI: -0.75, 1.02). Qualitative analysis identified theater and staff unavailability as common reasons for delay.CONCLUSION: Internal center practices have a significant impact on CIT, necessitating intervention to optimize transplant outcomes.
AB - BACKGROUND: Deceased donor kidney transplants often face delays, leading to prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT), yet data on post-allograft arrival delays are scarce.OBJECTIVES: This audit aims to identify and characterize the delays contributing to CIT prolongation after allograft arrival at the implanting center.DESIGN: Data was collected prospectively from 14 UK centers between February and September 2022. Timelines from allograft arrival to the implanting center to implantation were recorded for adult deceased donor kidney-only transplants.RESULTS: The median CIT for all 446 allografts [(donation after cardiac death (DCD), 48.2% and donation after brain death (DBD), 51.6%)] was 11:08 h (interquartile range (IQR): 08:15-15:12). A total of 42% of DCD and 15% of DBD allografts exceeded the national recommended duration of 12 and 18 h, respectively. CIT was prolonged in centers with dedicated transplant theaters, with a median CIT of 13:41 (IQR: 08:11-15:13) compared to a median CIT of 09:43 (IQR: 07:36-12:29) hours (p < 0.005, 95% CI: -4.40, -2.60) in centers without dedicated transplant theaters. Compared to full cross-match (FXM) results, a higher proportion of Virtual cross-match (VXM) results (75.2% vs. 89.4%, Odds Ratio (OR): 2.79, CI: 1.57-5.0, p < 0.005) were available before the allograft arrived at the implanting center. The proportion of crossmatch results available before the recipient's arrival at the implanting center was 31.7% (46.6% for VXM vs. 4.9% for FXM, OR: 16.76, CI: 7.50, 44.17, p < 0.005). However, no difference was found in CIT between the VXM (median: 11:06, IQR: 08:14-15:20) and FXM (median: 11:00, IQR: 08:34-14:56) groups (p = 0.75, CI: -0.75, 1.02). Qualitative analysis identified theater and staff unavailability as common reasons for delay.CONCLUSION: Internal center practices have a significant impact on CIT, necessitating intervention to optimize transplant outcomes.
KW - Humans
KW - Kidney Transplantation
KW - Cold Ischemia/adverse effects
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Male
KW - Female
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Tissue Donors/supply & distribution
KW - Graft Survival
KW - Adult
KW - Tissue and Organ Procurement
KW - Follow-Up Studies
KW - Prognosis
KW - Risk Factors
KW - Organ Preservation/methods
KW - Time Factors
KW - United Kingdom
U2 - 10.1111/ctr.70227
DO - 10.1111/ctr.70227
M3 - Article
C2 - 40767342
SN - 0902-0063
VL - 39
SP - e70227
JO - Clinical Transplantation
JF - Clinical Transplantation
IS - 8
ER -