Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Best Practices for Monitoring and Assessing the Ecological Response to River Restoration

  • Judy England*
  • , Natalie Angelopoulos
  • , Susan Cooksley
  • , Jennifer Dodd
  • , Andrew Gill
  • , David Gilvear
  • , Matthew Johnson
  • , Marc Naura
  • , Matthew O’hare
  • , Angus Tree
  • , Jennifer Wheeldon
  • , Martin A. Wilkes
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Environment Agency
  • APEM Ltd
  • The James Hutton Institute
  • Edinburgh Napier University
  • Centre for the Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science
  • University of Nottingham
  • Cranfield University
  • CBEC Eco-Engineering UK Ltd.
  • NatureScot
  • Natural England
  • Coventry University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

<jats:p>Nature-based solutions are widely advocated for freshwater ecosystem conservation and restoration. As increasing amounts of river restoration are undertaken, the need to understand the ecological response to different measures and where measures are best applied becomes more pressing. It is essential that appraisal methods follow a sound scientific approach. Here, experienced restoration appraisal experts review current best practice and academic knowledge to make recommendations and provide guidance that will enable practitioners to gather and analyse meaningful data, using scientific rigor to appraise restoration success. What should be monitored depends on the river type and the type and scale of intervention. By understanding how habitats are likely to change we can anticipate what species, life stages, and communities are likely to be affected. Monitoring should therefore be integrated and include both environmental/habitat and biota assessments. A robust scientific approach to monitoring and appraisal is resource intensive. We recommend that appraisal efforts be directed to where they will provide the greatest evidence, including ‘flagship’ restoration schemes for detailed long-term monitoring. Such an approach will provide the evidence needed to understand which restoration measures work where and ensure that they can be applied with confidence elsewhere.</jats:p>
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages0
JournalWater
Volume13
Issue number23
Early online date26 Nov 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Nov 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
  2. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Best Practices for Monitoring and Assessing the Ecological Response to River Restoration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this