Awareness is necessary for differential trace and delay eyeblink conditioning in humans.

Peter F. Lovibond*, Jean C.J. Liu, Gabrielle Weidemann, Christopher J. Mitchell

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Squire et al. have proposed that trace and delay eyeblink conditioning procedures engage separate learning systems: a declarative hippocampal/cortical system associated with conscious contingency awareness, and a reflexive sub-cortical system independent of awareness, respectively (Clark and Squire, 1998; Smith et al., 2005). The only difference between these two procedures is that the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US) overlap in delay conditioning, whereas there is a brief interval (e.g., 1s) between them in trace conditioning. In two experiments using the same procedure as Clark and Squire's group, we observed differential conditioning only in participants who showed contingency awareness in a post-experimental questionnaire, with both trace and delay procedures. We interpret these results to suggest that, although there may be multiple brain regions involved in learning, these regions are organized as a coordinated system rather than as separate, independent systems.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)393-400
Number of pages0
JournalBiol Psychol
Volume87
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2011

Keywords

  • Awareness
  • Conditioning
  • Classical
  • Eyelid
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Young Adult

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Awareness is necessary for differential trace and delay eyeblink conditioning in humans.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this