TY - JOUR
T1 - Author Correction
T2 - Social activity promotes resilience against loneliness in depressed individuals: a study over 14-days of physical isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia (Scientific Reports, (2022), 12, 1, (7155), 10.1038/s41598-022-11315-4)
AU - Ji, Julie L.
AU - Basanovic, Julian
AU - MacLeod, Colin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/2/7
Y1 - 2024/2/7
N2 - Correction to: Scientific Reportshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11315-4, published online 03 May 2022 The original version of this Article contained errors. In the original version of this Article, the p values in the Results section were swapped. “Results from the mixed-effects model showed a significant independent relationship between Loneliness and Social Activity Frequency with Close Contacts, b = − 0.385, p = 0.544, C.I.95% = [− 0.688; − 0.082], but not between Loneliness and Social Activity Frequency with either Intermediate Contacts, b = − 0.096, p = 0.086, C.I.95% = [− 0.408; 0.215], or with Distant Contacts, b = 0.263, p = 0.013, C.I.95% = [− 0.038; 0.564]. These results indicated that greater social interaction frequency with close contacts was associated with lower loneliness, but social interaction frequency with intermediate or distant contacts was not associated with lower loneliness.” now reads, “Results from the mixed-effects model showed a significant independent relationship between Loneliness and Social Activity Frequency with Close Contacts, b = − 0.385, p = 0.013, C.I.95% = [− 0.688; − 0.082], but not between Loneliness and Social Activity Frequency with either Intermediate Contacts, b = − 0.096, p = 0.544, C.I.95% = [− 0.408; 0.215], or with Distant Contacts, b = 0.263, p = 0.086, C.I.95% = [− 0.038; 0.564]. These results indicated that greater social interaction frequency with close contacts was associated with lower loneliness, but social interaction frequency with intermediate or distant contacts was not associated with lower loneliness.” In addition, the Data Availability section was omitted. It now reads, “Data availability The study’s Open Science Framework can be found at https://osf.io/yfz3n/.” The original Article has been corrected.
AB - Correction to: Scientific Reportshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11315-4, published online 03 May 2022 The original version of this Article contained errors. In the original version of this Article, the p values in the Results section were swapped. “Results from the mixed-effects model showed a significant independent relationship between Loneliness and Social Activity Frequency with Close Contacts, b = − 0.385, p = 0.544, C.I.95% = [− 0.688; − 0.082], but not between Loneliness and Social Activity Frequency with either Intermediate Contacts, b = − 0.096, p = 0.086, C.I.95% = [− 0.408; 0.215], or with Distant Contacts, b = 0.263, p = 0.013, C.I.95% = [− 0.038; 0.564]. These results indicated that greater social interaction frequency with close contacts was associated with lower loneliness, but social interaction frequency with intermediate or distant contacts was not associated with lower loneliness.” now reads, “Results from the mixed-effects model showed a significant independent relationship between Loneliness and Social Activity Frequency with Close Contacts, b = − 0.385, p = 0.013, C.I.95% = [− 0.688; − 0.082], but not between Loneliness and Social Activity Frequency with either Intermediate Contacts, b = − 0.096, p = 0.544, C.I.95% = [− 0.408; 0.215], or with Distant Contacts, b = 0.263, p = 0.086, C.I.95% = [− 0.038; 0.564]. These results indicated that greater social interaction frequency with close contacts was associated with lower loneliness, but social interaction frequency with intermediate or distant contacts was not associated with lower loneliness.” In addition, the Data Availability section was omitted. It now reads, “Data availability The study’s Open Science Framework can be found at https://osf.io/yfz3n/.” The original Article has been corrected.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184871763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-024-53556-5
DO - 10.1038/s41598-024-53556-5
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 38326405
AN - SCOPUS:85184871763
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 14
JO - Scientific Reports
JF - Scientific Reports
IS - 1
M1 - 3152
ER -
