Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

'Architexture': Reading the early years environment

  • Jan Georgeson*
  • , Gill Boag-Munroe
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Oxford

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter presents the findings from an ongoing project to develop understanding about how the physical environment of early years settings might influence the staffand families who use them. The co-occurrence of particular features of buildings with particular activities develops our expectations of the kinds of activity that might take place in different kinds of building; we therefore learn to 'read' buildings as texts - hence our adoption of the term 'architexture' - and while this may not be something that we can readily articulate, the combinations of sensory, social and cultural affordances of a building can affect how comfortable we feel when approaching, entering and using that building. We describe here what happened when we shared these ideas with early years practitioners to support them in thinking about their settings' buildings and wider environment. This analysis enabled staffto evaluate the extent to which their buildings were 'hard to read' or 'easy to read'. We argue that such an analysis is particularly important when settings are trying to reach those participants or users who might be reluctant or uncertain users of the space.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDebates on Early Childhood Policies and Practices
Subtitle of host publicationGlobal snapshots of pedagogical thinking and encounters
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages206-215
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9781136587085
ISBN (Print)9780415691000
Publication statusPublished - 16 May 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences

Keywords

  • Early years buildings
  • Enabling environments
  • Parental engagement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of ''Architexture': Reading the early years environment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this