TY - JOUR
T1 - Architecture as Cultural and Political Discourse: Case Studies of Conceptual Norms and Aesthetic Practices
AU - Bobic, N
PY - 2018/11/26
Y1 - 2018/11/26
N2 - In an world where understanding the applications, implications and parameters to do with discipline
is becoming ever-more important, there are very few books dedicated to scrutinizing the relations
between governing and space through a case by case study of architecture. Daniel Grinceri’s
Architecture as Cultural and Political Discourse: Case Studies of Conceptual Norms and Aesthetic
Practices is a text that precisely does that. The thematic of this monograph was grounded in his PhD
dissertation from the University of Western Australia; in eight chapters he maps the assertions and
consequences of power and violence across well-known and recognised buildings such as Notre
Dame de Paris to those less visible spaces, such as detention centres in Australia. The analysed case
studies are thematic and chronological, demonstrating the ways in which particular ways of
constructed thinking and knowledge accommodate not only the possibility, but also the permissibility
of using architecture to regulate interpretations, meaning and advertently, people.
AB - In an world where understanding the applications, implications and parameters to do with discipline
is becoming ever-more important, there are very few books dedicated to scrutinizing the relations
between governing and space through a case by case study of architecture. Daniel Grinceri’s
Architecture as Cultural and Political Discourse: Case Studies of Conceptual Norms and Aesthetic
Practices is a text that precisely does that. The thematic of this monograph was grounded in his PhD
dissertation from the University of Western Australia; in eight chapters he maps the assertions and
consequences of power and violence across well-known and recognised buildings such as Notre
Dame de Paris to those less visible spaces, such as detention centres in Australia. The analysed case
studies are thematic and chronological, demonstrating the ways in which particular ways of
constructed thinking and knowledge accommodate not only the possibility, but also the permissibility
of using architecture to regulate interpretations, meaning and advertently, people.
UR - https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/context/ada-research/article/1214/viewcontent/Grinceri.Review.Bobic_NBedit06042018a.pdf
U2 - 10.1080/10331867.2018.1463149
DO - 10.1080/10331867.2018.1463149
M3 - Book Review
SN - 1033-1867
VL - 28
SP - 433
EP - 435
JO - Fabrications: the journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand
JF - Fabrications: the journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand
IS - 3
ER -