Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A phase II, randomized, open-label, 52-week study of seladelpar in patients with primary biliary cholangitis

  • Christopher L. Bowlus*
  • , Michael R. Galambos
  • , Richard J. Aspinall
  • , Gideon M. Hirschfield
  • , David E.J. Jones
  • , Yvonne Dörffel
  • , Stuart C. Gordon
  • , Stephen A. Harrison
  • , Andreas E. Kremer
  • , Marlyn J. Mayo
  • , Paul J. Thuluvath
  • , Cynthia Levy
  • , Mark G. Swain
  • , Guy W. Neff
  • , David A. Sheridan
  • , Carmen M. Stanca
  • , Christoph P. Berg
  • , Aparna Goel
  • , Mitchell L. Shiffman
  • , John M. Vierling
  • Pol Boudes, Alexandra Steinberg, Yun Jung Choi, Charles A. McWherter
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of California at Davis
  • Piedmont Atlanta Hospital
  • Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust
  • University Health Network University of Toronto
  • Newcastle University
  • Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • Henry Ford Health System
  • Pinnacle Clinical Research
  • University of Oxford
  • Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg
  • University of Zurich
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • Mercy Medical Center Baltimore
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore
  • University of Miami
  • University of Calgary
  • LLC
  • University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust
  • New York University
  • University of Tübingen
  • Stanford University
  • Liver Institute of Virginia
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • Inc.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background & Aims
We examined the efficacy and safety of seladelpar, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-delta agonist, in adults with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) at risk of disease progression (alkaline phosphatase [ALP] ≥1.67xupper limit of normal [ULN]) who were receiving or intolerant to ursodeoxycholic acid.
Methods
In this 52-week, phase II, dose-ranging, open-label study, patients were randomized (1:1) to seladelpar 5 mg/day (n = 53) or 10 mg/day (n = 55) or assigned to 2 mg/day (n = 11; United Kingdom sites after interim analysis) for 12 weeks. Doses could then be uptitrated to 10 mg/day. The primary efficacy endpoint was ALP change from baseline to Week 8.
Results
Mean baseline ALP was 300, 345, and 295 U/L in the 2 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg cohorts, respectively. Twenty-one percent of patients had cirrhosis, 71% had pruritus. At Week 8, mean ± standard error ALP reductions from baseline were 26 ± 2.8%, 33 ± 2.6%, and 41 ± 1.8% in the 2 mg (n = 11), 5 mg (n = 49), and 10 mg (n = 52) cohorts (all p ≤0.005), respectively. Responses were maintained or improved at Week 52, after dose escalation in 91% and 80% of the 2 mg and 5 mg cohorts, respectively. At Week 52, composite response (ALP <1.67xULN, ≥15% ALP decrease, and normal total bilirubin) rates were 64%, 53%, and 67%, and ALP normalization rates were 9%, 13%, and 33% in the 2 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg cohorts, respectively. Pruritus visual analog scale score was decreased in the 5 mg and 10 mg cohorts. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events, and 4 patients discontinued due to adverse events.
Conclusions
Seladelpar demonstrated robust, dose-dependent, clinically significant, and durable improvements in biochemical markers of cholestasis and inflammation in patients with PBC at risk of disease progression. Seladelpar appeared safe and well tolerated and was not associated with any increase in pruritus.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)353-364
JournalJournal of Hepatology
Volume77
Issue number2
Early online date30 Mar 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A phase II, randomized, open-label, 52-week study of seladelpar in patients with primary biliary cholangitis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this