A note on the probability distribution function of the surface electromyogram signal.

Kianoush Nazarpour*, Ali H. Al-Timemy, Guido Bugmann, Andrew Jackson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The probability density function (PDF) of the surface electromyogram (EMG) signals has been modelled with Gaussian and Laplacian distribution functions. However, a general consensus upon the PDF of the EMG signals is yet to be reached, because not only are there several biological factors that can influence this distribution function, but also different analysis techniques can lead to contradicting results. Here, we recorded the EMG signal at different isometric muscle contraction levels and characterised the probability distribution of the surface EMG signal with two statistical measures: bicoherence and kurtosis. Bicoherence analysis did not help to infer the PDF of measured EMG signals. In contrast, with kurtosis analysis we demonstrated that the EMG PDF at isometric, non-fatiguing, low contraction levels is super-Gaussian. Moreover, kurtosis analysis showed that as the contraction force increases the surface EMG PDF tends to a Gaussian distribution.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-91
Number of pages0
JournalBrain Res Bull
Volume90
Issue number0
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2013

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Electromyography
  • Evoked Potentials
  • Motor
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Muscle Contraction
  • Muscle
  • Skeletal
  • Normal Distribution
  • Probability
  • Young Adult

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A note on the probability distribution function of the surface electromyogram signal.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this