A new approach to counting fossil and modern pollen grains: The orderly count

Tutku Tuncalı Yaman, Bikem Ekberzade, Hülya Caner*, Ruya Y. Dagdeviren, Sena Inkaya, Nurgul K. Kılıc, Suzanne A.G. Leroy, Fabienne Marret, Cetin Senkul, Jessie Woodbridge, Meral Avci

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Palynology, the study of pollen and spores, plays a crucial role in various scientific disciplines, including earth sciences (paleovegetation and paleoclimatology), botany, allergy, archaeology, forensic sciencs and cosmetics. This study delves into the critical question in fossil pollen analysis studies: the minimum count of pollen grains required for accurate estimation of vegetation composition. Various statistical methods have been proposed over the years to address this question. Our research introduces an alternative technique, the orderly count, tailored to the nature of palynological analysis. We apply this method to diverse sediment catchments, including peat bogs, marine and lake sediments, from different geographical locations. Additionally, we revisit the reliability coefficients and propose adjustments for more accurate results. Our findings suggest that relying on statistical methods without considering the specific characteristics of palynological data may lead to low reliability. We advocate for the integration of dissimilarity criteria and the orderly count in sample size assessments for enhanced accuracy in palynological analyses. Our study emphasizes the importance of choosing appropriate methodologies aligned with the unique aspects of palynology to ensure robust and reliable results.
Original languageEnglish
Article number105156
Number of pages13
JournalReview of Palaeobotany and Palynology
Volume328
Early online date6 Jul 2024
Publication statusPublished - 14 Jul 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A new approach to counting fossil and modern pollen grains: The orderly count'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this