TY - JOUR
T1 - A global meta-analysis of ecological effects from offshore marine artificial structures
AU - Lemasson, Anaëlle J.
AU - Somerfield, Paul J.
AU - Schratzberger, Michaela
AU - Thompson, Murray S.A.
AU - Firth, Louise B.
AU - Couce, Elena
AU - McNeill, C. Louise
AU - Nunes, Joana
AU - Pascoe, Christine
AU - Watson, Stephen C.L.
AU - Knights, Antony M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/3/22
Y1 - 2024/3/22
N2 - Marine artificial structures (MAS), including oil and gas installations (O&G) and offshore wind farms (OWFs), have a finite operational period. Selecting the most suitable decommissioning options when reaching end-of-life remains a challenge, in part because their effects are still largely undetermined. Whether decommissioned structures could act (sensu ‘function’) as artificial reefs (ARs) and provide desired ecological benefits is of particular interest. Here we use a meta-analysis approach of 531 effect sizes from 109 articles to assess the ecological effects of MAS, comparing O&G and OWFs to shipwrecks and ARs, with a view to inform their decommissioning. This synthesis demonstrates that while MAS can bring ecological benefits, important idiosyncrasies exist, with differences emerging between MAS types, habitat types, taxa and ecological metrics. Notably, we find limited conclusive evidence that O&G and OWFs would provide significant ecological benefits if decommissioned as ARs. We conclude that decommissioning options aimed at repurposing MAS into ARs may not provide the intended benefits.
AB - Marine artificial structures (MAS), including oil and gas installations (O&G) and offshore wind farms (OWFs), have a finite operational period. Selecting the most suitable decommissioning options when reaching end-of-life remains a challenge, in part because their effects are still largely undetermined. Whether decommissioned structures could act (sensu ‘function’) as artificial reefs (ARs) and provide desired ecological benefits is of particular interest. Here we use a meta-analysis approach of 531 effect sizes from 109 articles to assess the ecological effects of MAS, comparing O&G and OWFs to shipwrecks and ARs, with a view to inform their decommissioning. This synthesis demonstrates that while MAS can bring ecological benefits, important idiosyncrasies exist, with differences emerging between MAS types, habitat types, taxa and ecological metrics. Notably, we find limited conclusive evidence that O&G and OWFs would provide significant ecological benefits if decommissioned as ARs. We conclude that decommissioning options aimed at repurposing MAS into ARs may not provide the intended benefits.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188421714&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/context/bms-research/article/2727/viewcontent/Lemasson_et_al._2024_Global_meta_analysis_of_ecological_effects_of_offshore_structures_Nat_Sus.pdf
U2 - 10.1038/s41893-024-01311-z
DO - 10.1038/s41893-024-01311-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85188421714
SN - 2398-9629
VL - 7
SP - 485
EP - 495
JO - Nature Sustainability
JF - Nature Sustainability
IS - 4
ER -
