A comparison of linear and logarithmic auditory tones in pulse oximeters

Zoe Brown, Judy Edworthy*, J. Robert Sneyd, Joseph Schlesinger

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study compared the ability of forty anaesthetists to judge absolute levels of oxygen saturation, direction of change, and size of change in saturation using auditory pitch and pitch difference in two laboratory-based studies that compared a linear pitch scale with a logarithmic scale. In the former the differences in saturation become perceptually closer as the oxygenation level becomes higher whereas in the latter the pitch differences are perceptually equivalent across the whole range of values. The results show that anaesthetist participants produce significantly more accurate judgements of both absolute oxygenation values and size of oxygenation level difference when a logarithmic, rather than a linear, scale is used. The line of best fit for the logarithmic function was also closer to x ¼ y than for the linear function. The results of these studies can inform the development and standardisation of pulse oximetry tones in order to improve patient safety.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)350-357
Number of pages8
JournalApplied Ergonomics
Volume51
Issue number0
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Engineering (miscellaneous)

Keywords

  • Auditory perception
  • Patient monitoring
  • Patient safety
  • Pulse oximetry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of linear and logarithmic auditory tones in pulse oximeters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this