Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Call for Evidence‐Based Conservation and Management of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources

  • Carleton University
  • Deakin University
  • Stockholm Environment Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

<jats:p>Natural resource management agencies implement conservation policies with the presumption that they are effective and of benefit to aquatic ecosystems. However, it is often difficult to decide what management action to implement and what will be most effective. Here we call for natural resource management agencies to fully adopt and implement evidence‐based management (EBM) for conservation and fisheries management. We support this call by providing a primer on systematic reviews, a core tool in evidence synthesis but one that is rarely used in the context of fisheries management. We highlight the benefits and challenges associated with implementing EBM, with a particular focus on the routine decisions and management actions undertaken by natural resource practitioners. We submit that by adopting EBM, practitioners would have access to the best available evidence on the effectiveness of various management and conservation interventions, while providing defensible and credible evidence to inform decision‐making processes and policies.</jats:p>
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-149
Number of pages0
JournalFisheries
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Call for Evidence‐Based Conservation and Management of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this